![Origami tyrannosaurus park yong woo](https://kumkoniak.com/48.jpg)
Kim (Accepted), “The Design Sourcing Choice and Technological Performance in the Upscale and Downscale Markets of an Architectural Innovation”, Journal of Operations Management (UTD 24 / FT 50)
![origami tyrannosaurus park yong woo origami tyrannosaurus park yong woo](https://i1.wp.com/image.tmdb.org/t/p/w300/7euKnxnUz6HqjkAHsSLy2dsPvRg.jpg)
- Are incumbents’ decisions regarding innovation adoption timing, sourcing approach, and the retention of outsourced components mistaken or strategic in nature?.
- Why do early (or late) adopters show different segment choices?.
- Why do some early adopters switch from one sourcing approach in the early innovation period to other approaches in the later innovation period?.
- Why do early (or late) adopters choose one sourcing approach over others?.
- Why do some incumbents adopt a new innovation earlier than others?.
- My current study explores five research questions: pure buy sourcing choices)” to adopt the new innovation. low segment choices)”, and “how (make vs. later adoption timing)”, “where (high vs. When an innovator hits the market with a disruptive innovation shock, incumbents (followers) are faced with (at least) three key decisions - “when (earlier vs.
My current research interests seek to understand when, where, and how firms adapt to innovation shocks. Technology and Innovation Management / Strategic Management / Supply Chain Management.